EU AI Act Guide
Annex IV Technical Documentation: Structure, Template & Examples
Last updated: 2026-07-09
Annex IV is the blueprint for the technical documentation every high-risk AI system must have before it is placed on the EU market (Article 11). It is the document authorities, notified bodies where applicable and — increasingly — enterprise buyers ask for first, because it proves the rest of your compliance work actually happened.
The good news: Annex IV is a defined structure with nine headings, not an open-ended essay. Here is what each section must contain and where teams typically get stuck.
Not sure which tier applies to you? Check your system in 2 minutes — free and rule-based.
Quick shortcut
Already know you need documents? Skip straight to the Doc Pack — your classification is done for you.
Get Doc Pack ($229–$499)The nine sections of Annex IV
1) A general description of the system — intended purpose, provider, version, hardware requirements, market form, and instructions for use. 2) A detailed description of elements and development process — design specs, architecture, data requirements and provenance, human oversight measures, and pre-determined changes. 3) Monitoring, functioning and control details — capabilities, limitations, foreseeable misuse, input data specifications. 4) Performance metrics and their appropriateness. 5) The risk management system per Article 9. 6) Lifecycle changes description. 7) Applied harmonised standards or alternative solutions. 8) A copy of the EU declaration of conformity. 9) The post-market monitoring plan per Article 72.
Where teams get stuck
Section 2 is the workhorse and the usual bottleneck — most teams have never written down their data provenance, labelling methodology or oversight design in one place. Expect this section alone to surface gaps you then have to close (which is partly the point).
Section 4 trips up teams who report only aggregate accuracy. The Act expects metrics appropriate to the system's purpose — for a hiring tool, that means performance across demographic groups, not one blended number.
The technical documentation should exist before conformity assessment. Some downstream fields, such as the EU declaration of conformity details and live post-market monitoring evidence, may remain placeholders in a first draft until those steps exist.
Can you write it yourself?
Yes — the structure is public and no law says a lawyer must write it. What you need is discipline about completeness (every heading answered, gaps marked as gaps) and enough regulatory reading to use the right vocabulary. Budget 2–4 weeks of senior-engineer-plus-founder time for a first credible draft.
The shortcut is starting from a completed structure instead of a blank page: a template pre-filled from a questionnaire gives you the skeleton, the article references, and company-specific evidence gaps clearly marked, leaving your team the parts only you can know — metrics, data specifics, test results.
SME simplification
Article 11(1) lets SMEs, including startups, provide the Annex IV elements in a simplified form; the Commission is mandated to provide a simplified template. Simplified does not mean skippable — every element still needs an answer — but the depth expectation scales with company size.
You now know what's required. Rather not write it from scratch?
The AI Act Documentation Pack delivers your risk classification memo, Annex IV technical documentation, model card, AI usage policy and compliance roadmap — generated from a 15-minute questionnaire after checkout confirmation, from $229. 14-day refund if the delivered pack materially differs from the contents described at purchase. Not legal advice.
See the Doc Pack →Frequently asked questions
When does Annex IV documentation have to exist?
Before the high-risk system is placed on the market or put into service, and kept up to date afterwards. Current Commission implementation material points to 2 December 2027 for Annex III systems and 2 August 2028 for Annex I product-embedded systems.
Who sees this document?
Market surveillance authorities on request, notified bodies only where the applicable conformity route involves them — and, in practice, enterprise customers' procurement and security teams, who have started requesting it in vendor reviews.
How is this different from a model card?
A model card is a short, readable summary of capabilities and limitations. Annex IV documentation is the full regulatory record — the model card is roughly one input to Annex IV sections 1–3.
Related guides
EU AI Act Deadlines: The Complete 2025-2028 Timeline
Every EU AI Act deadline from February 2025 to August 2028 - what applies when, to whom, and what to do before 2 December 2027.
AI Act Compliance Tools Compared (2026): Platforms, Packs & DIY
Honest comparison of EU AI Act compliance options — GRC platforms like Vanta and Drata, documentation packs, and doing it yourself. Sized by risk, systems and workflow needs.
Is AI Resume Screening High-Risk Under the EU AI Act? (Yes — Here's What That Means)
AI recruitment and CV screening tools fall under Annex III of the EU AI Act. What HR-tech vendors and employers must do before 2 December 2027.
EU AI Act Compliance Checklist for SaaS Founders (2026)
A practical six-step EU AI Act compliance checklist for SaaS and AI teams - classify your systems, track the 2 August 2026 transparency date and 2 December 2027 Annex III date, and produce the documents buyers ask for.
About these guides
Written by the TrustPacket team. We track Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Commission guidance, and enforcement developments to keep these guides current. Not legal advice — when in doubt, consult qualified counsel.
Last updated: 2026-07-09 · Content review: 11 July 2026 · Questions? Email us
This is informational editorial content based on Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and cited official implementation material. It is not legal advice, not a conformity assessment, and does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Application depends on facts this guide cannot verify. Consult qualified counsel for a binding assessment.