Lawyer, GRC platform, or Doc Pack?
Honest answer: it depends on your risk tier, number of AI systems, evidence volume, framework overlap and workflow needs. Headcount helps, but it is only one signal. Here is the fit logic we use with checker results — including when we tell you not to buy from us.
Start with the official free option when you only need scoping.The European Commission's AI Act Compliance Checker is the right independent baseline for understanding which rules may apply. TrustPacket is not affiliated with the Commission; it is for the work after that baseline: editable documents, buyer-facing memos, article-referenced obligations, email delivery, and ongoing monitoring.
Open the official Commission checker| Law firm | GRC platform | TrustPacket | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | Several thousand dollars, depending on scope | Ongoing annual subscription | $229-$499 one-time ($49/month optional) |
| Speed | Custom timeline | Weeks of setup + ongoing work | Generated after questionnaire submission |
| Legal sign-off | Professional legal opinion | No | No — self-assessment, by design |
| Best for | Prohibited/ambiguous cases, bespoke situations | Many systems, frameworks, owners and audit cycles | Teams that need structured AI Act drafts prepared for buyer and counsel review |
What should drive the decision?
Number of AI systems
Risk tier and Article 27 uncertainty
Number of frameworks in scope
Evidence volume and audit frequency
Number of stakeholders who need workflow
Need for integrations and control automation
Headcount as a supporting signal
By fit
| Situation | Recommendation | Why |
|---|---|---|
| One or two AI systems, AI Act only | TrustPacket Doc Pack ($229-$499 one-time) | You need structured AI Act drafts more than workflow automation. Headcount is secondary if evidence volume is low. |
| Multiple systems or high-risk workflows | Doc Pack + counsel review where facts are ambiguous | Use TrustPacket to structure the first draft, then route edge cases, Article 6(3), Article 27 or conformity questions to qualified counsel. |
| Several frameworks, recurring audits, many stakeholders | GRC platform (+ AI Act-specific documents) | Evidence automation starts paying off when SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, AI Act, owners, controls and audit cadence all need one workflow. |
If you do need a platform
Four we would look at, with the sizing note we give checker users. We have applied to the affiliate programs of these platforms; none has approved us yet, so today these are plain links.
Vanta
AI Act framework built-in; best for 20–500 people doing SOC 2 + AI Act together.
Drata
AI governance module; strong for 50+ running several frameworks in parallel.
Secureframe
Broad framework library with hands-on support; fits 20–100 people.
Sprinto
Budget-friendly option for 10–50 person teams.
Not sure which tier you are in?
The free checker classifies your system in 2 minutes and recommends the right option for your size — including "you do not need to buy anything".
Run the free checkerDisclosure: some links on this page may become affiliate links if our applications are approved. We may then earn a commission at no cost to you. Recommendations are based on risk tier, systems, evidence volume, framework needs and workflow complexity, never on commission — full disclosure policy.